Washington My Health My Data Act: AI Health Data Privacy, Consent, and Geofencing Prohibition
Washington My Health My Data Act (MHMDA), effective March 31, 2024, is the broadest consumer health data privacy law in the United States. Unlike HIPAA, MHMDA covers any entity collecting consumer health data — including wellness apps, mental health chatbots, fitness AI, and behavioral analytics platforms with no HIPAA relationship. MHMDA defines consumer health data broadly to include data inferred from non-health signals (location, purchases, behavioral data). The geofencing prohibition categorically bans placing geofences around healthcare facilities. MHMDA provides a private right of action with treble damages under Washington's Consumer Protection Act — creating class action risk for AI products that process health data without consent.
MHMDA Scope: What Consumer Health Data Covers for AI
MHMDA defines consumer health data as any personal information linked to a consumer that identifies their past, present, or future physical or mental health. This covers: individual health conditions and diagnoses; social, psychological, and behavioral health interventions; surgeries and procedures; prescription medication use; bodily functions, vital signs, and symptoms from wearables; and — critically — data inferred from non-health signals to identify health status. The inference clause means that AI models using location, purchase history, or behavioral data to generate health-related predictions are processing consumer health data under MHMDA, even if the model inputs are not themselves medical records. This directly captures wellness AI, behavioral health platforms, and ad-tech that builds health profiles from consumer behavior.
HIPAA Exemption Is Narrow: Most Consumer Health AI Is Covered
MHMDA exempts PHI already governed by HIPAA notices — but only for that PHI, and only when held by a HIPAA-covered entity or business associate in that capacity. A HIPAA-covered hospital that collects patient data for treatment is exempt for that PHI — but the same hospital's wellness app or patient engagement AI using non-PHI data is covered. Any consumer-facing health app, wellness AI, or behavioral health platform with no HIPAA relationship is fully covered by MHMDA from the first day it collects health data from Washington residents. The HIPAA exemption does not apply to: employers running wellness programs; consumer fitness and wellness apps; digital therapeutics not operating as covered entities; or advertising platforms that build health profiles.
Consent Architecture Required for AI Health Data Systems
MHMDA requires meaningful, purpose-specific consent before collecting, using, or sharing consumer health data. Consent cannot be bundled in a general privacy policy or terms of service. Required consents: (1) collection consent before collecting health data for any purpose beyond the consumer's direct request; (2) sharing consent before sharing health data with third parties, even service providers; (3) inference consent before using non-health data to infer and share health status; (4) standalone written authorization before selling consumer health data. AI vendors are downstream third parties — sharing health data with an AI vendor for model training requires consumer consent even if the vendor signs a DPA.
Geofencing Prohibition: Categorical Ban Near Healthcare Facilities
MHMDA prohibits any regulated entity from implementing a geofence around a healthcare facility for the purpose of identifying, tracking, or collecting data from consumers seeking health services. This provision — effective July 25, 2023 — is absolute: there is no consent exception. You cannot ask consumers to consent to being geofenced around Planned Parenthood, addiction treatment centers, or mental health clinics. The prohibition covers the geofence itself, any inferences drawn from geofenced location signals, and sharing those inferences with advertisers or data brokers. This provision was a direct response to post-Dobbs data broker practices and is the first categorical restriction on location-based health data collection in US state law.
Private Right of Action and Class Action Risk Under CPA
Unlike Virginia CDPA or Texas TDPSA, MHMDA provides a private right of action through Washington's Consumer Protection Act (CPA). Consumers can sue for actual damages; willful violations enable treble (3×) damages. The AG also has independent enforcement authority with civil penalties up to $7,500 per violation. The first MHMDA class actions targeted health systems using Meta Pixel on patient portals — the pixel captured URL paths revealing which health conditions patients were researching (e.g., /appointments/oncology) and transmitted them to Meta without consent. This class action pattern is the dominant MHMDA enforcement risk for AI teams embedding third-party analytics or tracking SDKs on health-adjacent platforms.